Bash Redirection Fun With Descriptors

Cindy Sridharan
6 min readAug 17, 2020

--

Bash Redirection: The Basics

A bash script is commonly a set of commands. There are three standard file descriptors of any command:

  • 0 → stdin
  • 1 → stdout
  • 2 → stderr

There are two commonly used redirection operators:

  • > output (This is the default operator for fd 1)
  • < input (This is the default operator for fd 0)

Output Redirection

The most basic example of redirecting the output of a command to a file is:

echo "hello world" 1> foo.txt

This redirects the output of the echo command to a file called foo.txt. Since 1 is the default file descriptor for the > operator, it can be omitted. Hence the following is a valid bash command.

echo “hello world” > foo.txt

No Clobber and Forced Redirection

If the noclobber option to the set builtin has been enabled, the output redirection will fail if the file exists and is a regular file.

The forced redirection operator >| will redirect the output to the file even if the noclobber option is set.

Input Redirection

Likewise, the most canonical example of the < operator is the following command:

read input < foo.txt && echo "${input}"

Assigning file descriptors to files

Turns out there’s more that can be done with file descriptors in bash than just use it to redirect the input or output of commands.

In particular, bash allows of to assign file descriptors to files, and then operate on those files by just using the descriptors. This can be done with the exec command:

exec Z > file

which will assign file descriptor Y to a file for output.

~ : exec 5> bar.txt
~ : echo "bye, world" >& 5
~ : cat bar.txt
bye, world

The exec X < file command allows one to assign file descriptor X to a file for input.

~ : exec 6< bar.txt
~ : read -n input <& 6 && echo "${input}"
bye, world

Gotcha

Using file descriptor 5 might cause problems since when Bash creates a child process, as with exec, the child inherits fd 5.

Closing File Descriptors

Of course, the fact that bash allows one to open file descriptors also means there must surely be a way to close them. And there is!

exec Z <&-

is the syntax to close file descriptor Z, where Z can include values like 0, 1 and 2.

~ : exec 6< bar.txt
~ : read input <& 6 && echo "${input}"
bye, world
~ : exec 6<&-
~ : read input <& 6 && echo "${input}"
bash: 6: bad file descriptor

In the snippet above, we see that we can assign file descriptor 6 for input and successfully read from the file by just referring to the file descriptor 6. We then then close file descriptor 6, after which trying to read from the file using descriptor 6 results in an error.

We can even close the 3 standard file descriptors (0, 1 and 2) using this command. Basic shell functions like cat while rely on these file descriptors become non-functional in these cases.

bash-5.0$ echo "hello world" > foo.txt
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
hello world
bash-5.0$ exec 1<&-
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
cat: stdout: Bad file descriptor

When closing stdin (fd 0), the bash prompt understandably exits.

bash-5.0$ exec 0<&-
bash-5.0$ exit

And trying to close stderr (fd 2) results in a hang, on both macOS and Linux.

Closing file descriptors becomes important, inasmuch as child processes inherit all of the open file descriptors of the parent process. Closing a file descriptor prevents it from being inherited by a child process.

Moving File Descriptors

Yes, that’s right.

Bash allows one to move file descriptors.

Moving Input File Descriptors

exec X<&Y-

moves the file descriptor Y to file descriptor X, or the standard input (file descriptor 0) if X is not specified.

Y is closed after being duplicated to X.

bash-5.0$ echo "hello world" > foo.txt
bash-5.0$ exec 6< foo.txt
bash-5.0$ read input <& 6 && echo "${input}"
hello world
bash-5.0$ exec 7<&6-
bash-5.0$ read input <& 6 && echo "${input}"
bash: 6: Bad file descriptor
bash-5.0$ read input <& 7 && echo "${input}"
hello world

In the above code snippet, we see that once file descriptor 6 has been moved to 7, one can no longer access input from the file foo.txt using fd 6. However, one can access input from the file using fd 7.

Moving Output File Descriptors

Likewise, it’s also possible to move output descriptors.

exec X>&Y-

moves the file descriptor Y to file descriptor X, or the standard output (file descriptor 1) if X is not specified.

bash-5.0$ touch foo.txt
bash-5.0$ exec 6> foo.txt
bash-5.0$ echo "hello, world" >& 6
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
hello, world
bash-5.0$ echo "bye, world" >& 6
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
hello, world
bye, world
bash-5.0$ exec 8>&6-
bash-5.0$ echo "hello again, world" >& 6
bash: 6: Bad file descriptor
bash-5.0$ echo "hello again, world" >& 8
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
hello, world
bye, world
hello again, world

In the above snippet, we first assign fd 6 to file foo.txt for output. We can then redirect output to fd 6 instead of specifying the file by name. Next, we move fd 6 to fd 8, after which we can no longer use fd 6 to refer to the file for output redirection. However, we can use fd 8 for output redirection.

Using a Single File Descriptor to Read And Write

So far, we’ve specifically assigned file descriptors for input or output, but not both. It turns out bash has a special operator that allows one to perform both forms of redirection using a single operator:

exec X<>file

causes the file named file to be opened for both reading and writing on file descriptor X, or on file descriptor 0 if X is not specified. If the file does not exist, it is created.

bash-5.0$ touch foo.txt
bash-5.0$ exec 7<>foo.txt
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, New World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
Hello, World!
Hello, New World!
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$ read input <&7 && echo "${input}"
bash-5.0$

In the above snippet, we open a file foo.txt for both input and output on file descriptor 7. We then redirect two output streams to fd 7. When we then cat the file, we see that both of output streams have been written to the file.

When we next try to read from the file, the read doesn’t return anything. This is because the file descriptor 7 is pointing to the end of the file after the last character of the last output stream. Bash (thankfully!) doesn’t implement a built in or an operator that emulates lseek(2), so there’s no way to seek to the beginning of the file before issuing the read.

However, if we reissue the redirection command, we see that we can access input from the file descriptor.

bash-5.0$ touch foo.txt
bash-5.0$ exec 7<>foo.txt
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, New World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
Hello, World!
Hello, New World!
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$ read input <&7 && echo "${input}"
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$ exec 7<>foo.txt
bash-5.0$ read input <&7 && echo "${input}"
Hello, World!

Furthermore, we can redirect output of a command to the file we’ve just read a line from using the same file descriptor. It’ll overwrite the existing contents of the file, since we’re effectively just writing bytes to a file descriptor.

bash-5.0$ touch foo.txt
bash-5.0$ exec 7<>foo.txt
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ echo "Hello, New World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
Hello, World!
Hello, New World!
bash-5.0$ read input <&7 && echo "${input}"
bash-5.0$
bash-5.0$ exec 7<>foo.txt
bash-5.0$ read input <&7 && echo "${input}"
Hello, World!
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
Hello, World!
Hello, New World!
bash-5.0$ echo "Bye, World!" >&7
bash-5.0$ cat foo.txt
Hello, World!
Bye, World!
orld!
bash-5.0$

In the above snippet, we’re written two lines to a file, then done a “reset” on the file descriptor, then read a line from the file, and then used the same file descriptor to write another output stream to the file, which overwrites the content of the file.

Conclusion

The more I learn about bash, the more I’m convinced to never use the more advanced features bash offers.

A small and relatively safe subset of bash is best used for scripting. Anything this advanced/esoteric is likely to cause maintenance headaches as well as readability problems.

--

--

Cindy Sridharan
Cindy Sridharan

Written by Cindy Sridharan

@copyconstruct on Twitter. views expressed on this blog are solely mine, not those of present or past employers.